CIPAA 2012

The Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA) is Malaysia’s security-of-payment statute. Passed in June 2012 and brought into force on 15 April 2014 (when its Regulations and Exemption Order were made), it was the Malaysian government’s response to a construction sector “rife with payment delays, non-payment issues and solvency risks”. It is a direct member of the Prompt Payment Legislation family pioneered by the UK and Australia.

CIPAA 2012 [part-of] Prompt Payment Legislation CIPAA 2012 [regulates] Malaysia

CIPAA’s core mechanism is statutory Construction Adjudication: a contractor, subcontractor, supplier or consultant with a payment dispute under a written construction contract performed wholly or partly in Malaysia can refer it to an independent adjudicator for a binding decision within roughly 106 working days, at a fraction of the cost of court or arbitration. Two anti-avoidance features mirror the Australian Acts: parties cannot contract out of CIPAA, and Section 35 renders Pay-When-Paid Clauses void. A notable carve-out is the Exemption Order, which exempts parts of the Malaysian Government from CIPAA’s operation.

CIPAA 2012 [opposes] Pay-When-Paid Clauses CIPAA 2012 [relates] Construction Adjudication

The leading authority is the Federal Court’s 2019 decision in Jack-In Pile v Bauer, which held that because CIPAA affects substantive rights (not merely the dispute forum), it applies only prospectively — so Section 35 does not retrospectively void pay-when-paid clauses where parties exercised their contractual rights before CIPAA came into force. Industry uptake has been strong (around RM1.4 billion in claims adjudicated by 2016), but post-enactment academic studies found payment default remained prevalent — CIPAA accelerates recovery without eliminating the underlying Construction Payment Problem.

Jack-In Pile v Bauer [defines] CIPAA 2012

Connections

Sources